Section 32 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 32 : Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc ., is relevant. —Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, appears to the Court unreasonable, are themselves relevant facts in the following cases:—

1 when it relates to cause of death. —When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person's death comes into question. Such statements are relevant whether the person who made them was or was not, at the time when they were made, under expectation of death, and whatever may be the nature of the proceeding in which the cause of his death comes into question.

2 or is made in course of business. —When the statement was made by such person in the ordinary course of business, and in particular when it consists of any entry or memorandum made by him in books kept in the ordinary course of business, or in the discharge of professional duty; or of an acknowledgment written or signed by him of the receipt of money, goods, securities or property of any kind; or of a document used in commerce written or signed by him; or of the date of a letter or other document usually dated, written or signed by him.

3 or against interest of maker. —When the statement is against the pecuniary or proprietary interest of the person making it, or when, if true, it would expose him or would have exposed him to a criminal prosecution or to a suit for damages.

4 or gives opinion as to public right or custom, or matters of general interest. —When the statement gives the opinion of any such person, as to the existence of any public right or custom or matter of public or general interest, of the existence of which, if it existed he would have been likely to be aware, and when such statement was made before any controversy as to such right, custom or matter had arisen.

5 or relates to existence of relationship. —When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship 25 [by blood, marriage or adoption] between persons as to whose relationship 25 [by blood, marriage or adoption] the person making the statement had special means of knowledge, and when the statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.

6 or is made in will or deed relating to family affairs. —When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship 25 [by blood, marriage or adoption] between persons deceased, and is made in any will or deed relating to the affairs of the family to which any such deceased person belonged, or in any family pedigree, or upon any tombstone, family portrait, or other thing on which such statements are usually made, and when such statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.

7 or in document relating to transaction mentioned in section 13, clause (a). —When the statement is contained in any deed, will or other document which relates to any such transaction as is mentioned in section 13, clause (a).

8 or is made by several persons, and expresses feelings relevant to matter in question. —When the statement was made by a number of persons, and expressed feelings or impressions on their part relevant to the matter in question. Illustrations

(a) The question is, whether A was murdered by B; or A dies of injuries received in a transaction in the course of which she was ravished. The question is, whether she was ravished by B; or The question is, whether A was killed by B under such circumstances that a suit would lie against B by A's widow. Statements made by A as to the cause of his or her death, referring respectively to the murder, the rape, and the actionable wrong under consideration, are relevant facts.

(b) The question is as to the date of A's birth. An entry in the diary of a deceased surgeon, regularly kept in the course of business, stating that, on a given day he attended A's mother and delivered her of a son, is a relevant fact.

(c) The question is, whether A was in Calcutta on a given day. A statement in the diary of a deceased solicitor, regularly kept in the course of business, that, on a given day, the solicitor attended A at a place mentioned, in Calcutta, for the purpose of conferring with him upon specified business, is a relevant fact.

(d) The question is, whether a ship sailed from Bombay harbour on a given day. A letter written by a deceased member of a merchant's firm, by which she was chartered, to their correspondents in London to whom the cargo was consigned, stating that the ship sailed on a given day from Bombay harbour, is a relevant fact.

(e) The question is, whether rent was paid to A for certain land. A letter from A's deceased agent to A, saying that he had received the rent on A's account and held it at A's orders, is a relevant fact.

(f) The question is, whether A and B were legally married. The statement of a deceased clergyman that he married them under such circumstances that the celebration would be a crime, is relevant.

(g) The question is, whether A, a person who cannot be found, wrote a letter on a certain day. The fact that a letter written by him is dated on that day, is relevant.

(h) The question is, what was the cause of the wreck of a ship. A protest made by the Captain, whose attendance cannot be procured, is a relevant fact.

(i) The question is, whether a given road is a public way. A statement by A, a deceased headman of the village, that the road was public, is a relevant fact.

(j) The question is, what was the price of grain on a certain day in a particular market. A statement of the price, made by a deceased banya in the ordinary course of his business is a relevant fact.

(k) The question is, whether A, who is dead, was the father of B. A statement by A that B was his son, is a relevant fact.

(l) The question is, what was the date of the birth of A. A letter from A's deceased father to a friend, announcing the birth of A on a given day, is a relevant fact.

(m) The question is, whether, and when, A and B were married. An entry in a memorandum-book by C, the deceased father of B, of his daughter's marriage with A on a given date, is a relevant fact.

(n) A sues B for a libel expressed in a painted caricature exposed in a shop window. The question is as to the similarity of the caricature and its libellous character. The remarks of a crowd of spectators on these points may be proved.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Ravjappa vs Nilakanta Rao And Ors. on 3 October, 1960 - Karnataka High Court 

Bhim Mandal vs Magaram Corain And Ors. on 1 August, 1960 - Patna High Court 

Sugam @ Monty Harishankar Jaiswal vs Opponent(S)/ on 27 December, 2012 - Gujarat High Court 

Damodar Das vs Gokal Chand And Ors. on 14 July, 1884 - Allahabad High Court 

State Of Maharashtra vs Kamal Ahmed Mohd. Vakil Ansari on 14 March, 2013 - Supreme Court of India 

Vinay D. Nagar vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 March, 2008 - Supreme Court of India 

Sandy @ Ved Prakash & Ors. vs State on 19 February, 2010 - Delhi High Court 

Vishal Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 2 April, 2014 - Delhi High Court 

Sudhakar & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 2000 - Supreme Court of India 

Jadavkumar Liladhar Mainthia vs Pushpabai Mainthia Nee. on 23 June, 1943 - Bombay High Court 

Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984 - Supreme Court of India 

Kans Raj vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 26 April, 2000 - Supreme Court of India 

State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005 - Supreme Court of India 

Raghubhushana Tirthaswami vs Vidiavaridhi Tirthaswami on 29 February, 1916 - Madras High Court 

Smt. Beila Devi & Another vs State Of U.P. on 19 February, 2016 - Allahabad High Court 

Sanjay vs State on 16 December, 2009 - Delhi High Court 

Prabhash Sharma & Anr. vs State on 1 June, 2012 - Delhi High Court 

Emperor vs Motiram Raising on 30 June, 1936 - Bombay High Court 

Shyam Singh Hada And Ors. vs State on 22 November, 2001 - Rajasthan High Court 

Qeen-Empress vs Abdullah on 27 February, 1885 - Allahabad High Court