Showing posts with label Chapter 3. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chapter 3. Show all posts

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Section 58 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 58 : Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Facts admitted need not be proved. —No fact need to be proved in any proceeding which the parties thereto or their agents agree to admit at the hearing, or which, before the hearing, they agree to admit by any writing under their hands, or which by any rule of pleading in force at the time they are deemed to have admitted by their pleadings: Provided that the Court may, in its discretion, require the facts admitted to be proved otherwise than by such admissions.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 58 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Boraiah Alias Shekar vs State on 20 December, 2002 - Karnataka High Court 
Thursday vs By Advs.Sri.P.Vijaya Bhanu - Kerala High Court 
Kashibai Martand vs Vinayak Ganesh And Ors. on 22 February, 1955 - Bombay High Court 
Egon Zhender International Pvt. vs M/S Namgayal Institute on 25 October, 2013 - Delhi High Court 
Appavu Chettiar vs Nanjappa Goundan And Ors. on 2 May, 1913 - Madras High Court 
The Chief Commissioner Of Income vs Pamapathi on 31 January, 2008 - Karnataka High Court 
Syed Mustajab Husain vs Additional District Judge on 23 February, 2012 - Allahabad High Court 
Jalal And Sons And Another vs Sita Bai (Died) By Lrs. And Others on 20 February, 2001 - Andhra High Court 
Arulmighu Sri.Subramaniaswami vs Thiruchendur Panchayat Union on 6 March, 2008 - Madras High Court 
Ramkrishan Ganpat Futane And Ors. vs Mohammad Kasam And Ors. on 21 August, 1972 - Bombay High Court 

Section 57 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 57 : Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Facts of which Court must take judicial notice.—The Court shall take judicial notice of the following facts:— 1[
(1) All laws in force in the territory of India;]
(2) All public Acts passed or hereafter to be passed by Parliament 2[of the United Kingdom], and all local and personal Acts directed by Parliament 2[of the United Kingdom] to be judicially noticed;
(3) Articles of War for 3[the Indian] Army, 4[Navy or Air Force]; 5[(4) The course of proceeding of Parliament of the United Kingdom, of the Constituent Assembly of India, of Parliament and of the legislatures established under any law for the time being in force in a Province or in the State;]
(5) The accession and the sign manual of the Sovereign for the time being of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland;
(6) All seals of which English Courts take judicial notice: the seals of all the 6[Courts in 7[India]], and all Courts out of 5[India] established by the authority of 8[the Central Government or the Crown Representative]: the seals of Courts of Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction and of Notaries Public, and all seals which any person is authorized to use by 9[the Constitution or an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom or an] Act or Regulation having the force of law in 7[India];
(7) The accession to office, names, titles, functions, and signatures of the persons filling for the time being any public office in any State, if the fact of their appointment to such office is notified in 10[any Official Gazette];
(8) The existence, title and national flag of every State or Sovereign recognized by 11[the Government of India];
(9) The divisions of time, the geographical divisions of the world, and public festivals, fasts and holidays notified in the Official Gazette;
(10) The territories under the dominion of 11[the Government of India];
(11) The commencement, continuance, and termination of hostilities between 11[the Government of India] and any other State or body of persons;
(12) The names of the members and officers of the Court and of their deputies and subordinate officers and assistants, and also of all officers acting in execution of its process, and of all advocates, attorneys, proctors, vakils, pleaders and other persons authorized by law to appear or act before it;
(13) The rule of the road, 12[on land or at sea]. In all these cases, and also on all matters of public history, literature, science or art, the Court may resort for its aid to appropriate books or documents of reference. If the Court is called upon by any person to take judicial notice of any fact, it may refuse to do so, unless and until such person produces any such book or document as it may consider necessary to enable it to do so.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 57 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Whether The Building In Question vs Ext. 13 - Allahabad High Court 
N.R. Revanna vs T.V. Mallappa And Ors. on 1 September, 1964 - Karnataka High Court 
Girish Kumar And Anandavalli vs State Of Kerala on 31 October, 2007 - Kerala High Court 
Jit Singh Mohar Singh vs Municipal Committee And Anr. on 23 October, 1959 - Punjab-Haryana High Court 
S. Nagarajan vs Vasantha Kumar And Anr. on 26 November, 1987 - Kerala High Court 
S. Nagarajan, Asst. Collector vs Vasanthakumar And Anr. on 26 November, 1987 - Kerala High Court 
Rajeshwarhwa vs Sushma Govil on 27 October, 1988 - Delhi High Court 
State vs Gopal Singh on 21 September, 1955 - Madhya Pradesh High Court 
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation vs Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. on 7 October, 2015 - Delhi High Court 
Dhan Raj vs Kishni And Anr. on 23 May, 1997 - Rajasthan High Court 

Section 56 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 56 : Section 56 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved.— No fact of which the Court will take judicial notice need to be proved.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 56 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Banas Domnic Miranda vs A.K. Ankola And Others on 8 April, 1982 - Bombay High Court 
The Assistant Director vs Khader Sulaiman, P. Krishnasamy on 9 January, 2003 - Madras High Court 
The State Of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. vs Kothacheruvu Plantations on 17 April, 2014 - Andhra High Court 
The Assistant Director vs Khader Sulaiman on 9 January, 2003 - Madras High Court 
L. Tulsi Ram And Ors. vs Maiku Lal And Ors. on 20 March, 1951 - Allahabad High Court  
District Judge Hardoi 6215 vs Saurabh Kumar on 21 July, 2014 - Allahabad High Court 
State Of Rajasthan vs Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd. on 14 February, 1969 - Rajasthan High Court 
Dhanpat vs State on 5 June, 1959 - Allahabad High Court 
Yarlagadda Venkakka Choudary vs Daggubati Lakshminarayana on 31 March, 1995 - Andhra High Court 
Tejmal Punamchand Burad vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 2 July, 1991 - Bombay High Court