IEA 40 : Section 40 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.—The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Courts from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit, or to hold such trial.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 40 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Fatten Lall vs Gujju Lall on 1 June, 1880 Calcutta High Court
Pushpa Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Learned Adj on 23 July, 2015 Allahabad High Court
Ibne Hasan vs Smt. Hasina Bibi And Ors. on 31 January, 1984 Allahabad High Court
State Of Bihar vs Radha Krishna Singh & Ors on 20 April, 1983 Supreme Court of India
City Municipal Council vs C. Ramu on 13 July, 1988 Karnataka High Court
Daya Sapra vs Vishnu Dutt Sharma on 14 December, 2007 Delhi High Court
Ramesh Chand Gupta & Ors. vs Union Of India & Anr. on 6 February, 2009 Delhi High Court
Bishunath Tewari And Ors. vs Mst. Mirchi on 6 May, 1952 Patna High Court
Moosa vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 December, 2005 Kerala High Court
The State Of Bihar vs Lalu Prasad And Ors. on 20 March, 2008 Patna High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment