IEA 42 : Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41.—Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 41, are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry; but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state. Illustration A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the land, which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 42 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Raj Kumar Karwal vs Union Of India And Ors.Withkirpal on 21 March, 1990 Supreme Court of India
State Of Bihar vs Radha Krishna Singh & Ors on 20 April, 1983 Supreme Court of India
K.G. Premshanker vs Inspector Of Police And Anr on 12 September, 2002 Supreme Court of India
The Secretary Of State For India vs Syed Ahmad Badsha Sahib Bahadur on 13 October, 1920 Madras High Court
The Secretary Of State For India vs Syed Ahmad Badsha Bahadur on 11 April, 1921 Madras High Court
Shri Satyawan Pagi And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 2 March, 2006 Bombay High Court
Natibabu Khadka vs State Of Goa on 13 July, 1995 Bombay High Court
Bal Mukund Jaiswal vs Bharat Sangh Dwara Aasuchana on 26 March, 1993 Allahabad High Court
Ramesh Chand Gupta & Ors. vs Union Of India & Anr. on 6 February, 2009 Delhi High Court
Jagdish Chandra Soni vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 January, 1998 Rajasthan High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment