IEA 44 : Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved.—Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 40, 41 or 42 and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 44 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Kamakshya Narain Singh Bahadur vs Baldeo Sahai And Ors. on 10 March, 1948 - Patna High Court
Bishunath Tewari And Ors. vs Mst. Mirchi on 6 May, 1952 - Patna High Court
Kishan Lal Barwa vs Sharda Saharan & Another on 18 February, 2015 - Allahabad High Court
K.K. Swaminathan vs Srinivasagam on 1 January, 1800 - Madras High Court
Mt. Siraj Fatima And Ors. vs Mahmood Ali And Ors. on 27 February, 1932 - Allahabad High Court
Ibne Hasan vs Smt. Hasina Bibi And Ors. on 31 January, 1984 - Allahabad High Court
K.K.Swaminathan vs Srinivasagam on 10 October, 2003 - Madras High Court
Bhagwandas Narandas vs D.D. Patel And Co. on 8 October, 1939 - Bombay High Court
Madavi vs Raji on 27 June, 2011 - Kerala High Court
Rajib Panda vs Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra And Ors. on 18 July, 1899 - Calcutta High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment