IEA 107 : Section 107 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years.—When the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is shown that he was alive within thirty years, the burden of proving that he is dead is on the person who affirms it.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 107 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Tadepalli Ram Rathnam vs Kantheti Varadarajulu And Ors. on 29 August, 1969 - Andhra High Court
Ramachandra Sadashiv Sidras Oka vs Keshav Dhondu Narvekar And Ors. on 9 November, 1922 - Bombay High Court
Mustt. Amrana Begum Mazumdar vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 1 February, 2006 - Gauhati High Court
Geddeam Damayanti And Anr. vs Geddam Akkamma And Ors. on 26 September, 2007 - Andhra High Court
Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years.—When the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is shown that he was alive within thirty years, the burden of proving that he is dead is on the person who affirms it.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 107 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Tadepalli Ram Rathnam vs Kantheti Varadarajulu And Ors. on 29 August, 1969 - Andhra High Court
Ramachandra Sadashiv Sidras Oka vs Keshav Dhondu Narvekar And Ors. on 9 November, 1922 - Bombay High Court
Mustt. Amrana Begum Mazumdar vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 1 February, 2006 - Gauhati High Court
Geddeam Damayanti And Anr. vs Geddam Akkamma And Ors. on 26 September, 2007 - Andhra High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment