IEA 133 : Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Accomplice.—An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 133 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Muthukumaraswami Pillai vs King-Emperor on 17 April, 1912 - Madras High Court
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs State Of Bihar on 13 July, 1994 - Supreme Court of India
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs State Of Bihar With Gurbachan on 13 July, 1994 - Supreme Court of India
Muralidharan vs State, Rep. By Inspector Of Police on 13 August, 1996 - Madras High Court
Gopi Chand Alias Pappu vs State on 2 August, 2013 - Delhi High Court
Raksha Jindal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 5 March, 2015 - Delhi High Court
Sitaram Sao @ Mungeri vs State Of Jharkhand on 12 November, 2007 - Supreme Court of India
Mrinal Das & Ors vs State Of Tripura on 5 September, 2011 - Supreme Court of India
No comments:
Post a Comment