IEA 113A : Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.—When the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the Court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.1[113A. Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.—When the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the Court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband." Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “cruelty” shall have the same meaning as in section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).]
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 113a Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Rajiv Narula vs State on 11 August, 2009 - Delhi High Court
Krishan Lal And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 4 May, 1994 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
Samir Samanta And Anr. vs State on 15 June, 1991 - Calcutta High Court
Jagir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 26 February, 2014 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
P. Bikshapathi And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 1988 - Andhra High Court
Baldev Raj vs Chander Prakash And Ors. on 2 July, 2007 - Delhi High Court
Hans Raj vs State Of Haryana on 26 February, 2004 - Supreme Court of India
Harikumar vs State Of Karnataka on 22 October, 1993 - Karnataka High Court
Niharbala Banerjee And Anr. vs State on 20 September, 1988 - Calcutta High Court
Vineet Suri vs State on 1 August, 2014 - Delhi High Court
Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.—When the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the Court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.1[113A. Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.—When the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the Court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband." Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “cruelty” shall have the same meaning as in section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).]
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 113a Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Rajiv Narula vs State on 11 August, 2009 - Delhi High Court
Krishan Lal And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 4 May, 1994 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
Samir Samanta And Anr. vs State on 15 June, 1991 - Calcutta High Court
Jagir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 26 February, 2014 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
P. Bikshapathi And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 1988 - Andhra High Court
Baldev Raj vs Chander Prakash And Ors. on 2 July, 2007 - Delhi High Court
Hans Raj vs State Of Haryana on 26 February, 2004 - Supreme Court of India
Harikumar vs State Of Karnataka on 22 October, 1993 - Karnataka High Court
Niharbala Banerjee And Anr. vs State on 20 September, 1988 - Calcutta High Court
Vineet Suri vs State on 1 August, 2014 - Delhi High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment