IEA 121 : Section 121 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Judges and Magistrates.—No Judge or Magistrate shall, except upon the special order of some Court to which he is subordinate, be compelled to answer any question as to his own conduct in Court as such Judge or Magistrate, or as to anything which came to his knowledge in Court as such Judge or Magistrate; but he may be examined as to other matters which occurred in his presence whilst he was so acting. Illustrations
(a) A, on his trial before the Court of Sessions, says that a deposition was improperly taken by B, the Magistrate. B cannot be compelled to answer questions as to this, except upon the special order of a superior Court.
(b) A is accused before the Court of Sessions of having given false evidence before B, a Magistrate. B cannot be asked what A said, except upon the special order of the superior Court.
(c) A is accused before the Court of Sessions of attempting to murder a police officer whilst on his trial before B, a Sessions Judge. B may be examined as to what occurred.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 121 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Md.Ajmal Md.Amir Kasab @Abu vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 August, 2012 - Supreme Court of India
Barindra Kumar Ghose And Ors. vs Emperor on 23 November, 1909 - Calcutta High Court
Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Syed vs State Of Karnataka By Magadi Road on 12 December, 2012 - Karnataka High Court
Registrar (Vigilance), High vs Station House Officer, Police on 18 August, 2001 - Andhra High Court
Mohd.Arif @ Ashfaq vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 10 August, 2011 - Supreme Court of India
Union Of India vs Orient Engg. & Commercial Co. Ltd. on 7 October, 1977 - Supreme Court of India
Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Handa vs State Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 5 July, 2012 - Delhi High Court
Vikas @ Vicky Ramchandra Goel And vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 18 April, 1990 - Bombay High Court
Bansi Lal vs State And Anr. on 11 October, 1979 - Delhi High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment