IEA 108 : Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years.—1[Provided that when] the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is 2[shifted to] the person who affirms it.—1[Provided that when] the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is 2[shifted to] the person who affirms it."
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 108 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Radha Gajapathi Raju vs Assistant Controller Of Estate on 12 June, 1998 - Madras High Court
Zishan Khan vs District Inspector Of Schools on 2 March, 2012 - Allahabad High Court
M. Venkata Seshamma vs Brahmandam Venkata Kusala Rao on 22 October, 2007 - Andhra High Court
Geddeam Damayanti And Anr. vs Geddam Akkamma And Ors. on 26 September, 2007 - Andhra High Court
Tadepalli Ram Rathnam vs Kantheti Varadarajulu And Ors. on 29 August, 1969 - Andhra High Court
Mustt. Amrana Begum Mazumdar vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 1 February, 2006 - Gauhati High Court
Shankareppa vs Shivarudrappa And Ors. on 27 July, 1962 - Karnataka High Court
Gurdit Singh And Ors. Etc vs Munsha Singh And Ors. Etc on 29 November, 1976 - Supreme Court of India
K.I. Pavunny vs Assistant Collector (Head ... on 3 February, 1997 - Supreme Court of India
R. Gopala Pathar vs N. Jayalakshmi Ammal And Ors. on 15 June, 1984 - Madras High Court
Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years.—1[Provided that when] the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is 2[shifted to] the person who affirms it.—1[Provided that when] the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is 2[shifted to] the person who affirms it."
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 108 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Radha Gajapathi Raju vs Assistant Controller Of Estate on 12 June, 1998 - Madras High Court
Zishan Khan vs District Inspector Of Schools on 2 March, 2012 - Allahabad High Court
M. Venkata Seshamma vs Brahmandam Venkata Kusala Rao on 22 October, 2007 - Andhra High Court
Geddeam Damayanti And Anr. vs Geddam Akkamma And Ors. on 26 September, 2007 - Andhra High Court
Tadepalli Ram Rathnam vs Kantheti Varadarajulu And Ors. on 29 August, 1969 - Andhra High Court
Mustt. Amrana Begum Mazumdar vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 1 February, 2006 - Gauhati High Court
Shankareppa vs Shivarudrappa And Ors. on 27 July, 1962 - Karnataka High Court
Gurdit Singh And Ors. Etc vs Munsha Singh And Ors. Etc on 29 November, 1976 - Supreme Court of India
K.I. Pavunny vs Assistant Collector (Head ... on 3 February, 1997 - Supreme Court of India
R. Gopala Pathar vs N. Jayalakshmi Ammal And Ors. on 15 June, 1984 - Madras High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment