Section 113 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 113 : Section 113 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Proof of cession of territory.—A notification in the Official Gazette that any portion of British territory has 1[before the commencement of Part III of the Government of India Act, 1935 (26 Geo. 5, ch. 2)] been ceded to any Native State, Prince or Ruler, shall be conclusive proof that a valid cession of such territory took place at the date mentioned in such notification.—A notification in the Official Gazette that any portion of British territory has 2[before the commencement of Part III of the Government of India Act, 1935 (26 Geo. 5, ch. 2)] been ceded to any Native State, Prince or Ruler, shall be conclusive proof that a valid cession of such territory took place at the date mentioned in such notification."

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 113 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Lal Kishore Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 7 April, 2014 - Patna High Court
State By Sub-Inspector Of Police vs Satish Shetty And Ors. on 13 September, 2007 - Karnataka High Court
Sakal Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 13 February, 2014 - Patna High Court
Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 13 March, 2001 - Supreme Court of India
Rajiv Narula vs State on 11 August, 2009 - Delhi High Court
Shanthakumar vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 23 November, 2006 - Madras High Court
Ghusabhai vs Mr.M.R.Mengdey on 9 July, 2008 - Gujarat High Court
Ghusabhai vs Mr.M.R.Mengdey on 9 July, 2008 - Gujarat High Court
4 Whether This Case Involves vs State on 23 February, 2015 - Gujarat High Court
Xavier vs The Deputy Superintendent Of on 25 February, 2010 - Madras High Court