Section 167 Indian Evidence Act

Chapter 11: Of Improper Admission and Rejection of Evidence

IEA 167 : Section 167 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:

No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence.—The improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any decision in any case, if it shall appear to the Court before which such objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision, or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, it ought not to have varied the decision.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 167 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Mangala Prosad vs V.J. Manerikar And Ors. on 3 January, 1964 - Calcutta High Court 

State vs Gali Chalapathi Rao And Ors. on 14 February, 1974 - Andhra High Court 

5 Whether It Is To Be Circulated  vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 1 December, 2014 - Gujarat High Court 

Vishal Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 2 April, 2014 - Delhi High Court 

Valimahomed Gulamhussain vs C.T.A. Pillai, Additional on 18 December, 1959 - Bombay High Court 

Ramu vs State Of Karnataka on 18 April, 1991 - Karnataka High Court 

Hitnarain Singh vs Rambarai Rai And Ors. on 20 April, 1928 - Patna High Court 

Vallabhdas Liladhar And Ors vs Assistant Collector Of Customs on 27 January, 1964 - Supreme Court of India 

Narain And Two Others vs The State Of Punjab on 4 December, 1958 - Supreme Court of India 

Ramkishan Mithanlal Sharma vs The State Of Bombay. on 22 October, 1954 - Supreme Court of India