Section 90a Indian Evidence Act

IEA 90a : Section 90-a of the Indian Evidence Act:

90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old. —Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the 98 [electronic signature] which purports to be the 98 [electronic signature] of any particular person was so affixed by him or any person authorised by him in this behalf. Explanation. —Electronic records are said to be in proper custody if they are in the place in which, and under the care of the person with whom, they naturally be; but no custody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin, or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to render such an origin probable. This Explanation applies also to section 81A.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 90a Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Ram Jas And Ors. vs Surendra Nath And Anr. on 28 January, 1980 - Allahabad High Court 

Manjoor Ali And Anr. vs Kishmat Ali And Ors. on 24 March, 2004 - Allahabad High Court 

Kedar And 3 Ors. vs Gobari on 16 August, 2013 - Allahabad High Court 

Dr. Jeevan Bahadur Samaddar vs Govind Charan Samaddar And Others on 30 May, 2013 - Allahabad High Court 

Smt. Vidya Devi And Ors. vs Nand Kumar on 12 February, 1981 - Allahabad High Court 

Amrita Devi And Ors. vs Sripat Rai And Ors. on 3 February, 1961 - Allahabad High Court 

Gauri Shankar Gupta vs Shri Keshavji Gaudiya Math on 19 October, 2010 - Allahabad High Court 

Bhaggal And Ors. vs Rangi Lal And Ors. on 29 August, 1985 - Allahabad High Court 

Satish And Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 16 July, 2009 - Supreme Court of India