IEA 28 : Section 28 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise relevant.—If such a confession as is referred to in section 24 is made after the impression caused by any such inducement, threat or promise has, in the opinion of the Court, been fully removed, it is relevant.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 28 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Sabavva Kom Hanmappa Simpiger vs Basappa Andaneppa Chiniwar on 30 September, 1954 Bombay High Court
A. S. Krishna vs State Of, Madras on 28 November, 1956 Supreme Court of India
E. Keshava Bhat vs K.S. Subraya Bhat on 29 August, 1979 Kerala High Court
Raghu Nath Dass And Ors. vs Rajendra Kumar And Ors. on 19 December, 1961 Allahabad High Court
Employees' State Insurance vs Spangles And Glue Manufacturers on 2 February, 1967 Punjab-Haryana High Court
K. Hashim vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 17 November, 2004 Supreme Court of India
The Chief Commissioner Of Income vs Pamapathi on 31 January, 2008 Karnataka High Court
Ummu Salma Beevi vs Balaraman on 24 December, 1996 Madras High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment