Section 29 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 29 : Section 29 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Confession otherwise relevant not to become irrelevant because of promise of secrecy, etc.—If such a confession is otherwise relevant, it does not become irrelevant merely because it was made under a promise of secrecy, or in consequence of a deception practised on the accused person for the purpose of obtaining it, or when he was drunk, or because it was made in answer to questions which he need not have answered, whatever may have been the form of those questions, or because he was not warned that he was not bound to make such confession, and that evidence of it might be given against him.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 29 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Rangappa Hanamappa And Anr. vs State on 8 September, 1953 Bombay High Court 

Shanti And Anr. vs The State on 4 May, 1977 Orissa High Court 

In Re: Mannem Edukondalu vs Unknown on 18 April, 1957 Andhra High Court 

Shri F.P. Gracie vs Shri Vithal Ganpat More on 25 November, 1975 Bombay High Court 

E.Sivanesan vs Satharia Ahle Sunnath Jamath on 10 January, 2011 Madras High Court 

Girish Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 31 October, 2007 Kerala High Court 

Rajan Tiwary vs State Of Bihar Thru.C.B.I on 17 May, 2013 Patna High Court 

Girish Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 31 October, 2007 Kerala High Court