IEA 86 : Section 86 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records.—The Court may presume that any document purporting to be a certified copy of any judicial record of 1[2[***] any country not forming part of India] or of Her Majesty’s dominions is genuine and accurate, if the document purports to be certified in any manner which is certified by any representative of 3[***] the 4[Central Government] 5[in or for] 6[such country] to be the manner commonly in use in 7[that country] for the certification of copies of judicial records. 8[An officer who, with respect to 9[***] any territory or place not forming part of 10[India or] Her Majesty’s dominions, is a Political Agent therefore, as defined in section 3, 11[clause (43)], of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be a representative of the 12[Central Government] 13[in and for the country] comprising that territory or place].
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 86 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Gms Marine Company Limited vs The Owners And Parties Interested on 7 May, 2010 - Calcutta High Court
Dr. Chhotalal Jivabhai Patel vs Vadilal Lallubhai Mehta And Ors. on 29 September, 1967 - Gujarat High Court
Natasha Kohli vs Man Mohan Kohli on 25 February, 2013 - Delhi High Court
National West Minister Bank vs General Public And Ors. on 17 February, 2005 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
Darbara Singh Guru vs Mohammad Sadique on 7 April, 2015 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ganee Mahomed Sarkar vs Tarini Charan Chuckerbati on 5 April, 1887 - Calcutta High Court
Y. Narasimha Rao And Ors vs Y. Venkata Lakshmi And Anr on 9 July, 1991 - Supreme Court of India
The State vs Abdul Hamid And Anr. on 9 January, 1957 - Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ktc Korea Co. Ltd. vs Hobb International Private Ltd. on 18 March, 2004 - Calcutta High Court
Dr. Manas Bhunia vs Dr. Makhan Lal Bangal & Ors. on 7 April, 1999 - Calcutta High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment