IEA 96 : Section 96 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons.—When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to. Illustrations
(a) A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, “my white horse”. A has two white horses. Evidence may be given of facts which show which of them was meant.
(b) A agrees to accompany B to Haidarabad. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Haidarabad in the Dekkhan or Haidarabad in Sindh was meant.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 96 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Parbhoo And Ors. vs Emperor on 16 September, 1941 - Allahabad High Court
Rishi Kesh Singh And Ors. vs The State on 18 October, 1968 - Allahabad High Court
Ramakrishnan vs V.S. Kuttan Pillai And Anr. on 16 March, 1978 - Kerala High Court
Yusuf Sk. And Ors. vs The State on 12 January, 1954 - Calcutta High Court
Yusuf Sk. And Ors. vs The State on 12 January, 1954 - Calcutta High Court
Shyamlal Mohanlal vs State Of Gujarat on 14 December, 1964 - Supreme Court of India
State Of Gujarat vs Shyamlal Mohanlal on 11 October, 1962 - Gujarat High Court
Laxman And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 May, 2001 - Rajasthan High Court
Belapur Co. Ltd. vs Maharashtra State Farming on 22 August, 1968 - Bombay High Court
State Of Gujarat vs Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi on 14 December, 1964 - Gujarat High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment