Section 95 Indian Evidence Act

IEA 95 : Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act:

Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts.—When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts, evidence may be given to show that it was used in a peculiar sense. Illustration A sells to B, by deed, “my house in Calcutta”. A had no house in Calcutta, but it appears that he had a house at Howrah, of which B had been in possession since the execution of the deed. These facts may be proved to show that the deed related to the house of Howrah.

India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 95 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Kailash Chandera Sharma vs The Superintendent Of Post on 31 March, 1960 - Punjab-Haryana High Court 

United India Fire And General vs Kalsum Begum And Ors. on 19 August, 1986 - Gauhati High Court 

Sardar Mahendra Pal Singh And Anr. vs Prakash Chand Goyal And Ors. on 4 February, 1986 - Madhya Pradesh High Court 

Raghbir Singh Gill vs Gurcharan Singh Tohra & Ors on 9 May, 1980 - Supreme Court of India 

Pandit Ram Saroop And Anr. vs Balbir Singh And Ors. on 8 September, 1987 - Delhi High Court 

Pradeep Kumar vs Mahaveer Pershad And Ors. on 26 August, 2002 - Andhra High Court 

Pandit Ram Saroop And Another vs Balbir Singh And Others on 8 September, 1989 - Delhi High Court 

Branch Manager, National vs Bhumani Venkatamma And Ors. on 18 October, 1996 - Andhra High Court 

Association Of Commerce House vs Vishandas Samaldas And Ors. on 8 December, 1980 - Bombay High Court 

The State vs Jati Ram And Ors. on 27 November, 1972 - Allahabad High Court