IEA 22 : Section 22 of the Indian Evidence Act:
When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant.—Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 22 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
State Of Mysore vs K. Mohamed Ismail on 20 December, 1957 Karnataka High Court
Acharu vs Rappai And Ors. on 31 August, 1978 Kerala High Court
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd vs Wyeth Limited on 7 August, 2009 Delhi High Court
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd vs Wyeth Limited on 7 August, 2009 Delhi High Court
The Management Of vs The Presiding Officer on 7 April, 2010 Madras High Court
M/S Kishorilal Loomba And Sons And vs Debts Recovery Tribunal, on 18 October, 2000 Madhya Pradesh High Court
State Of Gujarat vs R.N. Vora And Ors. on 16 September, 1986 Gujarat High Court
Gangadhar S/O Gonduram Tadme vs Trimbak S/O Govindrao Akingire on 12 April, 2004 Bombay High Court
Textile Mills, Bombay State And vs Their Employees, Nakshatra, Etc. on 29 October, 1958 Bombay High Court
Smt. Sumati K. Shirodkar vs Miss Terezinha Serrao And Ors. on 5 August, 1994 Bombay High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment