IEA 97 : Section 97 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.—When the language used applies partly to one set existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply. Illustrations A agrees to sell to B “my land at X in the occupation of Y". A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y, but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.
India's Important Case Laws and Landmark Judgments on IEA - Section 97 Indian Evidence Act 1872:
Pradeep Kumar vs Mahaveer Pershad And Ors. on 26 August, 2002 - Andhra High Court
Kanhaiya Bhalotia vs The Union Of India on 26 September, 2013 - Patna High Court
Kanhaiya Bhalotia vs The Union Of India Through The on 26 September, 2013 - Patna High Court
Sujanapal vs State Of Kerala on 25 February, 2010 - Kerala High Court
Ahammed Kabeer vs Azeez on 6 February, 2002 - Kerala High Court
Friday vs Vijayan @ Vijayappan - Kerala High Court
Judge vs Unknown on 7 August, 2010 - Kerala High Court
Arikala Narasa Reddy vs Venkataram Reddy Reddygari & Anr on 4 February, 2014 - Supreme Court of India
Ramachandra Govind Take And Ors. vs The State on 6 March, 1968 - Bombay High Court
Alla Basavapunnareddy vs Kalaga Krishnayya And Ors. on 16 June, 1965 - Andhra High Court
No comments:
Post a Comment